Skip to content
News
Share this post

Supreme Court Based Sports Betting Decision on States Rights, Not Morality

June 1, 2018 iDEA

Fav Icon iDEA GamingAttorneys Jeff Ifrah and David Yellin of Ifrah Law, a founding member of iDEA, recently published a response to the Supreme Court decision in Murphy v. NCAA in The George Washington Law Review. Their expert analysis spells out the immediate impacts of this groundbreaking decision, and what it could mean for states considering the legalization of sports betting.

The authors examine the Court’s rationale for its decision to overturn the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act of 1992 (PASPA), showing how the issue of state’s rights trumped opponents’ arguments based on the morality of gambling.  They also lay out their predictions for the aftermath of the decision: state legislatures must develop innovative regulations to manage new methods of sports betting, especially online; and sports leagues will continue to try to find ways to control and profit from sports betting.

For the full article click here.

Get the top iGaming news right in your inbox!

Meet the leaders in online gaming innovation in the U.S.

anaxi-logo-white
ballys-logo-white-2
bet365
betmgm-white-logo
better-collective
boyd-white-logo
Catena Media_white logo (4)
continent-8-white-logo
draftkings-white-logo
image_alt
fan-duel-white-logo
gambling-com-white-logo
gamewise-white-logo
geocomply-white-logo
ifrah-logo-2023-tagline-stacked-white
image_alt
rush-street-shite-logo
image_alt
worldpay-white-logo